Power For Power?

July 11, 2013
BY Eric Hal Schwartz
Pro-Israel and other politicians questioning Obama’s choice of Samantha Power as ambassador to the UN
President Barack Obama  nominated Samantha Power as U.S. ambassador to the UN Several thought-leaders are not supportive of the move.  (Olivier Douliery/ABACAUSA.COM/Newscom)

President Barack Obama nominated Samantha Power as U.S. ambassador to the UN Several thought-leaders are not supportive of the move.
(Olivier Douliery/ABACAUSA.COM/ Newscom)

A panel of conservative political activists, writers and former military officers convened last week at the National Press Club to sharply criticize President Barack Obama’s nomination of Samantha Power as permanent ambassador to the United Nations.

The event served as an announcement that those concerns had been laid out in a letter to Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and signed by dozens of epresentatives of national security, pro-Israel and related conservative advocacy groups.

“In light of her low regard for our country, her animus toward one of our most important allies, Israel, and her affinity for those who would diminish our sovereignty and strengthen our adversaries, we consider her to be a wholly unacceptable choice for this sensitive post and urge you to reject this nomination,” the letter stated.

Frank Gaffney, president of the sponsoring Center for Security Policy, cited the letter as the reason for the panel discussion he then led over Power’s nomination. While the members cited an extensive list of concerns, it really could be boiled down to their contention that Power could and would not act favorably on behalf of the U.S. and its allies, especially Israel.

“Whatever one thinks of her patriotism, it is very clearly not a view of patriotism that is shared by the vast majority of the American people,” Gaffney said.

Her remarks in a 2002 interview in which she advocated American investment in a new Palestinian state with a “mammoth protection force,” said Gaffney, could lead to “alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import.”

“Samantha Power is bad for America, bad for Israel, and we strongly oppose her nomination,” said Mort Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America, adding that she is “basically really extreme and leftist.”

Power, who has been involved with the Obama administration in various roles since 2008, has since said her own quotes don’t make sense to her, rejecting any notion she might be hostile to Israel. She has recently said she now believes the conflict will be resolved by negotiations, but the panelists dismissed that as political disingenuousness.

“She does a Jackie Mason,” Klein said.

Former Florida congressman Allen West agreed with the panel’s assessment, and argued Power as “ideal for Obama,” explaining that it is “consistent in this administration to side with radical Islam.”

Rep. West derided Power as an “uber-left militant progressive” and “loyal Obama acolyte.” He added that she was just a part of the “troubling, weak and disturbing” national security team assembled by Obama.

Despite these anti-Israel concerns, Power has received hearty endorsements from prominent pro-Israel groups.

“She’s absolutely not anti-Israel,” said Aaron Keyak, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council.”

Keyak cited staunch conservative Israeli advocates who have spoken and written approvingly of Power such as Alan Dershowitz and Josh Block of the Israel Project, as well as Israeli ambassador Michael Oren. Lawmakers including conservative senators such as John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) have also voiced approval for her nomination.

For some of the panelists, the concerns were larger than just Power but extended to suspicion over the entire concept of the UN, both for a perceived anti-U.S. and anti-Israel bias and the suspicion over a sinister trans-nationalist agenda also highlighted in the letter.

“I oppose her on the grounds of U.S. sovereignty,” said William Boykin, executive vice president of the Family Research Council.

He said he believes the U.N. wants to be a global governing body, overriding national independence and that Power subscribes to that same view.

Author Diana West also expressed broader worries, questioning the goals and tactics of the organization itself. West called it a “strategic prong of Marxism-Leninism” due in part to the role American Alger Hiss, later convicted as a spy of the Soviet Union, played in its formation.

For now, Powers’ nomination remains in play. Although Obama has encouraged the Senate to move quickly to confirm her, there are no set dates for confirmation hearings or votes.

ADD COMMENTS

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

33,704 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress